Algorithmic Efficiency Prompter
Reads the execution journal for human gates that only ever confirm the obvious and proposes the deterministic node that would reclaim the wait.
Runnable once promoted to PROD
Proposals
1
automatable gates
Hours saved / mo (est.)
4.7
reclaimable wait at current volume
HITL gates in estate
6
across live app versions
Basis
Volume-ranked
below evidence bar — ranked by wait
Automation candidates
| Gate node | Proposed change | Runs | Avg wait | Reclaimable | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| hitl | Human in loop → Decision | 9 | 31.6 min | 4.7 h | LOW |
Reclaimable hours by gate
Estimated wait recovered if automated
Human gates in the estate
| App | Category | Gate | Approver role | SLA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Counterparty Credit Risk Early Warning | Middle office | Risk Officer Review | Risk officer | 60 min |
| Dynamic Valuation Control (VCA) Engine | Middle office | Product Control | Risk officer | 120 min |
| Limit Breach Orchestrator | Middle office | Risk Officer Decision | Risk officer | 30 min |
| Portfolio Stress-Tester & Rebalancer | Macro | Desk Head Approval | Desk head | 240 min |
| Trade Fails & Exception Resolution Agent | Back office | Ops Review | Desk head | 90 min |
| Visual App Release Manager | Governance | Reviewers | Compliance officer | 480 min |
How this is derived
Run history is still thin, so candidates are ranked by the total wait each gate has cost rather than auto-proposed. Reclaimable hours = average wait × runs parked.